Trump got written briefing on ‘Russia bounties’, reports say: The White House is underneath pressure to give an explanation for how an awful lot the management knew about allegations Russia provided the Taliban bounties to kill US troops.
Officials have insisted that President Donald Trump was no longer “for my part” knowledgeable of the alleged plot in Afghanistan in 2019.
But reviews say the president received a written briefing earlier this year.
There is a subject that Mr. Trump might have had to get admission to facts approximately threats to US forces but did not act.
The intelligence reportedly arrived amid the US attempts to barter a peace deal to stop the 19-year warfare in Afghanistan and while Mr.
Trump sought to enhance members of the family with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Reports by way of the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, quoting unnamed US officers, said a Russian army intelligence unit had presented Taliban-linked militants bounties to kill US troops in Afghanistan.
What’s going on between Russia, the US, and Afghanistan?
Twenty American troops died in Afghanistan in 2019, but the New York Times stated it was not clear which deaths have been below suspicion.Russia denied the preliminary reports, even as the Taliban stated it had now not made any address authorities intelligence.
The allegations come as Mr. Trump seeks re-election in November.
Moscow maintains near hyperlinks with the Taliban, as it sees the USA involvement in Afghanistan winding down, the BBC’s diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says.
He says Russia is also waging a “grey” or undeclared conflict in opposition to the West. Under President Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin has started from every perceived indignity suffered since the fall of the Soviet Union. It becomes US support for Afghan irregular opponents that contributed to Moscow’s forced withdrawal from Afghanistan in the Nineteen Eighties. Pressed on the bounty claims, the White House spokeswoman on Tuesday insisted that Mr. Trump become now not briefed on the problem and claimed that “rogue intelligence officials” have been at the back of the leak to the New York Times.
Asked to make clear if she supposed contributors of America intelligence community had been going after the president, Kayleigh McEnany said: “It very likely will be. Trump got written briefing on ‘Russia bounties’, reports say.”
What are the new developments?
On Monday, the New York Times, bringing up two unnamed US officials, stated the intelligence assessment was included in the President’s Daily Brief document – a written document with key authorities intelligence – in late February.
CNN and the Associated Press have also reported that the president received the intelligence in a written briefing in advance this yr, without specifying while. Mr. Trump is said to largely ignore the President’s Daily Brief, depending more on oral briefings by intelligence officials a few instances every week.
Ms. McEnany said there has been “no consensus within the intelligence network” approximately the evaluation. But former intelligence officials told US media that, in previous administrations, claims of such importance would be stated to the president, even supposing the evidence had no longer been fully set up.
She also defended Mr. Trump whilst questioned whether the president reads his intelligence reviews, announcing he “does study and also consumes intelligence verbally”.
“This president I’ll inform you is the maximum knowledgeable individual on planet earth in terms of the threats that we face,” she said.
Eight Republican participants of Congress attended a White House briefing led through Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Monday.
Some expressed alarm approximately the claims, calling for the movement against Russia and President Putin to be taken if the intelligence reports, presently below review, were confirmed Trump got written briefing on ‘Russia bounties’, reports say.
Representatives Liz Cheney and Mac Thornberry, who is the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, stated: “We consider it is essential to vigorously pursue any information associated with Russia or every other us of targeting our forces.”
Democrats have been not included within the initial meeting, and that they have been scheduled to participate in a briefing with White House officers on Tuesday.
The Associated Press stated that pinnacle officers inside the White House were conscious in early 2019 of the classified intelligence on the topic and that the evaluation had been blanketed in as a minimum one of President Trump’s written each day briefings at the time.
What is the context?
The unnamed officers cited through the New York Times’ preliminary file stated US intelligence businesses had concluded months ago that a unit of Russia’s GRU army intelligence agency had sought to destabilize its adversaries with the aid of covertly imparting bounties for a successful assault on coalition forces.
Watch: What is the GRU?
Islamist militants, or armed criminal elements carefully associated with them, were believed to have accumulated the cash.
The White House’s National Security Council changed into said to have considered how to reply, consisting of by implementing an escalating raft of sanctions in opposition to Russia Trump got written briefing on ‘Russia bounties’, reports say.
President Trump changed into briefed at the reports in March, the New York Times said. Mr. Trump denied having been briefed, tweeting that neither he nor Vice-President Mike Pence had been informed: “about the so-known as attacks on our troops in Afghanistan with the aid of Russians”.
Sergei Zhirnov, a former agent of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), told BBC Russian that the GRU’s actions might be a part of a bigger sport between Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump unfolding in the international arena Trump got written briefing on ‘Russia bounties’, reports say.
“The GRU is a large gadget, which matches making war. Putin likes to flex his muscle tissues when there may be no hazard of retribution,” said Mr. Zhirnov.